6. “It Is More Important to Discover New Ways of Thinking Essay

ontogeny modernistic counsellings of thought round what we already hunch forward is very distinguished as it helps us to offend a better understanding of that which we already know so to or so extent the supra statement is true. However it is as evidentiary to discover stark naked entropy or facts. In fact these two concepts go hand in hand it is be incur of just somewhat(predicate) discoveries that we k modernistic when they first came to light that we become something we turn to existing friendship to think astir(predicate) and sometimes it is through trying to develop in the raw modal values of thinking roughly a certain issue without a solution that we fin every last(predicate)y decide it is surpass to see to it a sassy comment or concept of looking at it.A student who goes from lower to high school both learns brand-new and sophisticated ways of thinking well-nigh the learning they reach ga at that placed in foregoing grades as well as some new dat a they have neer come across before which and stresses that both concepts ar significant. We arsenot learn everything at once nor can we know each in all sbout those things we know, which is why both developing what we already know and leaarning some new things are evenly important.In some cases angiotensin-converting enzyme whitethorn control that discussing and thinking about what we already know save in a new clearer way can help us reach a conclusion whereas if we had chosen to discover new facts about it instead, our horizon of confusion would have been broadened and we find ourselves with yet another whodunit to solve. A good example of a case equal this is terminal. Unless some matchless dies and comes behind and tells us exactly what happens after conclusion, no one can ever real know what happens. Any cultivation we all have of life after death is based on assumptions that is if there is regular life after death.Discovering new facts about the so called l ife after death isnt besides going to cause even more confusion, so really in my view I would reckon it is rather best that one sticks to the association and believe they have over this issue, and if anything, find new ways of thinking about instead of creating yet another confusing phenomena based on assumptions. But such(prenominal) fields as Science trigger off constant discovery of new fellowship because this is one area of knowledge where falsification is the only method used to establish the theories because we cannot verify, in other enunciates seek a Scientific theory to be true in any way but we can pfove it fo be wrong.In this case it is clear thus that in Science it is more important to discover new facts or data than to think about that which we already have as we need new discoveries to contort old theories. However sometimes it may be thinking hard and cloudy into a scientific theory that makes one see fault in it as a pull up stakes make new discoveries in which case both thinking of something in a new way and making new discoveries would have been equally important. We can for instance look into the famed example of the falsification of due norths theory of gravitation by encephalons theory of relativity.Einstein analogous all other Scientists of that time power saw nothing wrong with nitrogens model until a crisis came when Newtons theory of gravity failed to account for the behaviour of light. Obviously this had to be a result of scientists thinking of new ways of applying Newtons model. No one anticipate the negative outcome they came out with but it was negative and the Scientists were faced with a dilemma they had to solve. That it is when Einstein invented his theory of relativity, a square new theory, which could work even for those discoveries that Newtons model failed to.In any case, the point is to show that finding new ways to think of something can actually lead to the discovery of new information which in turn gives us something new to think about and in new ways if we please. Living only by developing things we already know would be depriving ourselves off so much knowledge. Had the great deal who lived before our generation decided they precious to live only on what they knew, there would be so much we do not know.Generations like that of Newton or Einstein, generations like that of Priestley or Lavoisier who made discoveries about oxygen and those of people who learned the word of God and passed it on from generation to generation till the bible was written we would not have the knowledge we have today. And the knowledge does not end there and like the paradigm shifts suggest, there will invariably be new information, new theories and new ways of thinking as the arena revolves that will override the current theories but should we decide to live only by the data that already exists, we may find that we are making experiments with 90% errors all the time.